So. What exactly are you trying to say?









:tongue2:


For the record, I completely agree with you on this one :yes:

 

The pool can get deep you know. This is where I truly question how much tape some of these watch before they say stuff like this. It is contradictory, odd and just makes them look rather silly in the end.

Please let me know if I ever start doing that - seriously.

 

I concur. McShay has always been like this too. Kiper has been better but I don't understand why he thinks Stafford is a better QB than Bradford.

 

By the way, can McShay act as though he is prepared to answer the question instead of fumbling around the whole time.

 

All I know is that Moreno should go ahead of Wells. :shifty:

 

I think McShay may be confusing Beanie Wells with Maurice Wells.

 

I guess we will have to make you go the way of old yeller if it happens. :up:

 

Yeah I can see that. :lol:

I ain't goin' quietly though.

 

I like Stafford better than Bradford.

 

Why so?

 

Bigger arm and runs a pro-style offense.

 

Doesn't have the accuracy of Bradford and he's inconsistent though. I'd rather take Bradford but that's just my choice lol.

 

I just think Stafford is a more NFL Ready QB. Not to spark a Big 12/SEC debate, but Staff has played against some pretty tough D's this year as well. JMO though.

 

I see some similarities between Staff and Matt Ryan. I think Bradford may eventually be a better player, but Id say he has a better chance of ending up in a bad system and busts out. Some of these spread offense QBs have stats and tapes that look alot better than prostyle QBs, but ultimately just cant trasition so well to the NFL, especially in year 1-2.
I think if an NFL team is not primarily a spread O and is looking to bring in a QB to start early, Stafford is your man. Bradford might appeal to a team like KC though who is going more and more into the spread offense.