anyone think we might sign vincent jackson now that he hasnt signed his tender?
-
-
-
No.
-
Not going to happen.
-
CashInFist likes this.
-
LandShark13 likes this.
-
Bpk likes this.
-
No in VJ.
Agreed with the last poster on David Martin. He'd be a good seam busting, pass catching TE for us if none of the 2nd stringer shows up large in training camp. -
very much doubt it ... not saying we couldn't use him ... just doubt it has much traction with the FO ...
-
Didnt we recently pony up a boatload of $ for a top receiver?
-
Agree with Big E, we need a TE, we've got a pretty solid corps of WR's now with Marshall, Cammy, Hartline, Bess, Turner (please show up Pat). FS & TE are our weakest spots, except OLB's that have PROVEN they can sack the QB.
Frankly I like our roster right now, so no to V. Jackson.Big E likes this. -
I don't see it bro. He's a good receiver don't get me wrong. I just don't see them trading for an over 30 receiver and letting him take a roster spot from one of their young guys. IMO anyway. -
No I don't think it will happen. What may actually happen is AJ may reduce there contract money for Jackson, McNeil and others and it may get real nasty in San Diego.:wink2:
-
-
What about Brandon Marshall? I hear he is on the trading block.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Signing of WR Reed shows Bolts are moving on
However, the implication of Reed’s signing Friday is clearly that the Chargers are moving forward, preparing to fill out their receiving corps without Jackson.
Jackson and McNeill are dissatisfied with the one-year contract tenders they received as restricted free agents and are, according to numerous sources, prepared to sit out into and perhaps through the season. -
SD signing Reed is a message to TO, that is the reason for the other thread, if TO/Rosenhaus aren't getting it by now, then TO will be retired no matter how cheaply he offers to work for...:yes:Fin Fan In Cali likes this. -