Who will be the Offensive/Defensive P.O.Y. for the Dolphins?

Offense:

Ryan Tannehill - 4,750 yds 40 TDs 8 INTs

Defense:

Cameron Wake - 70 tackles 17.5 sacks

Pretty easy, Tannehill and Suh.

"dolfan7171 wrote:

Offense:

Ryan Tannehill - 4,750 yds 40 TDs 8 INTs

Defense:

Cameron Wake - 70 tackles 17.5 sacks

If RT puts up those numbers ... :hammertime::domodance:

Offensive: Tannehill 4,250 PassYards 33 PassTD 380 RushYards 2 RushTD

Defensive: Suh... not because of stats but because of what he wil open up for other guys

MVP: Landry - 1,250 RecYards 12 RecTD and his great KR duties and decent PR duties

Tannyhill and Girthkwake

"Aqua4Ever04 wrote:

Dallas Thomas and Walt Aikens

I like our line of thinking there...if those 2 are the MVPs, that means we had a SERIOUSLY good team!

"dolfan7171 wrote:

Offense:

Ryan Tannehill - 4,750 yds 40 TDs 8 INTs

Defense:

Cameron Wake - 70 tackles 17.5 sacks

I don't see Wake putting up those tackles numbers, as his career high to date is 57. The sacks seem unlikely, but somewhat plausible if some of his hurries get converted thanks to Suh.

I don't see any way Tannehill breaks 35 TDs either under the best of circumstances, or so few INTs for that matter, it'd just be such a big jump to me to go from 27 to 40 (in the past 10 yrs only 7 different players have hit more than 35). Best case for him IMO is like 4,500 yards (if he gets his ypa up) and 35 TDs, like I mentioned. It'll take a hell of a season to get that. For him to get more yards than that, I feel like we'd have to lose Miller and our running game would just need to be abysmal.

Going to go out on a limb here; Suh, Tannehill.

It's a big limb, low to the ground.

"Stitches wrote:

I don't see Wake putting up those tackles numbers, as his career high to date is 57. The sacks seem unlikely, but somewhat plausible if some of his hurries get converted thanks to Suh.

I don't see any way Tannehill breaks 35 TDs either under the best of circumstances, or so few INTs for that matter, it'd just be such a big jump to me to go from 27 to 40 (in the past 10 yrs only 7 different players have hit more than 35). Best case for him IMO is like 4,500 yards (if he gets his ypa up) and 35 TDs, like I mentioned. It'll take a hell of a season to get that. For him to get more yards than that, I feel like we'd have to lose Miller and our running game would just need to be abysmal.

I'm OK with 4,500 yards for the season.

Most likely: Defense: Suh then Wake. I would like it to be Jelani Jenkins, i really believe in that kid when a LB is your defensive MVP it usually means your defense had a great year.
Most likely: Offense: Tannehill then Landry then Albert. I would like it to be Devante Parker, because that would mean the offense was on fire and he had a Randy Moss like rookie year.

"Pauly wrote:

Most likely: Defense: Suh then Wake. I would like it to be Jelani Jenkins, i really believe in that kid when a LB is your defensive MVP it usually means your defense had a great year.
Most likely: Offense: Tannehill then Landry then Albert. I would like it to be Devante Parker, because that would mean the offense was on fire and he had a Randy Moss like rookie year.

Sounds good to me.

"Stitches wrote:

I don't see Wake putting up those tackles numbers, as his career high to date is 57. The sacks seem unlikely, but somewhat plausible if some of his hurries get converted thanks to Suh.

I don't see any way Tannehill breaks 35 TDs either under the best of circumstances, or so few INTs for that matter, it'd just be such a big jump to me to go from 27 to 40 (in the past 10 yrs only 7 different players have hit more than 35). Best case for him IMO is like 4,500 yards (if he gets his ypa up) and 35 TDs, like I mentioned. It'll take a hell of a season to get that. For him to get more yards than that, I feel like we'd have to lose Miller and our running game would just need to be abysmal.

I could see Tannehill getting more than 35 TDs. He had 24 TDs in 89 redzone attempts and only 3 TDs from outside the redzone last year. I could easily see him getting up to 7-9 TDs from outside the redzone and convert about a third of his redzone pass attempts into TDs.

"shamegame13 wrote:

Offensive: Tannehill 4,250 PassYards 33 PassTD 380 RushYards 2 RushTD

Defensive: Suh... not because of stats but because of what he wil open up for other guys

MVP: Landry - 1,250 RecYards 12 RecTD and his great KR duties and decent PR duties

If Landry stays at 9 yards per reception he'll need 138 receptions this season TO GET TO 1250 YARDS
138 receptions would be second best all time for receptions in the NFL
Don't see that happening with all the other weapons Tanny will have

"miamiron wrote:

If Landry stays at 9 yards per reception he'll need 138 receptions this season TO GET TO 1250 YARDS
138 receptions would be second best all time for receptions in the NFL
Don't see that happening with all the other weapons Tanny will have

Of course he won't get 138...

...but he'll have more than 9 YPC too.

Tannehill - 4300 yards, 33 TD
Wake - 18 sacks

Landry and Suh - based on what they do for stats and away from stats

"miamiron wrote:

If Landry stays at 9 yards per reception he'll need 138 receptions this season TO GET TO 1250 YARDS
138 receptions would be second best all time for receptions in the NFL
Don't see that happening with all the other weapons Tanny will have

If you really think the ambitious, hard working Landry is gonna stay at 9 YPC, then im sorry for you and dont know what to tell you. Your basing stats off a rookie year where he was underutilized and lets forget the fact that Landry has 'Superstar' written all over him.