So, we have Javorski Lane who seems decent enough to me. And, really, are FB's that vital and is there that big a differentiation between Lane and another? Really?
Yet, I've seen several locations have FB as a position of "need" for Miami. Mel Kiper (who never seems to draft well for Miami, imo - though I like Mel, I've never thought he understood the team), even has Miami taking a FB at 3/82! Are you kidding, Mel? With RB & TE still untapped in the draft?
Just not getting this.
-
Da 'Fins Season Ticket Holder Staff Member Club Member
-
No idea. FB aren't even used that widely in the NFL anymore. Spending a 3rd round pick on one makes no sense. Prehaps, Mel is thinking of Miami getting a good shortage back, which isn't a bad idea, but a FB is unnecessary to accomplish that goal.
-
Kiper is usually massively off base when it comes to the Dolphins
Darius Bey comes to mind. -
To be fair, you aren't going to use the FB from Harvard as strictly a blocker if you take him. If used right, he could be as useful as any TE we take at that spot.
-
-
MrClean likes this.
-
-
I think the Dolphins need to consider whittling down Jorvorskie Lane unless he's improved this off-season. Charles Clay doesn't have the same upside as a run blocker, but in practice he is pretty much as good and Lane isn't going to threaten on wheel routes 30 yards down the field or be able to play +/- 50% of his snaps in the slot.
I was kind of disappointed the Dolphins didn't consider one of the fullbacks this off-season. Greg Jones is quite good, and it's still possible Vonta Leach will be on the market.
-
Jmo, but I have zero interest in spending a draft pick on a FB. -
-
Da 'Fins Season Ticket Holder Staff Member Club Member
http://www.thephinsider.com/2013/4/21/4249744/2013-nfl-mock-draft-mel-kipers-a-draft-for-dolphins -
Jorvorskie Lane was not as good as people thought he was. Particularly his lead blocking. And when they tried to give him the ball in short yardage, he fumbled. A lot. And didn't even convert on some of the occasions he didn't fumble. He's great with a load of steam out in the flat after he's caught the ball...but that's about it.
I would absolutely be looking at Lonnie Pryor and Kyle Juszczyk.Stitches likes this. -
Eh, do think Lane needs some competition, but objectively he was more or less out of football so a learning curve is to be expected.
-
Juszczyk is a good player. Can pass pro well, can run and catch. I like him. I think more teams need to use fullbacks that can be assets in pass pro and as pass catchers.
Stitches and Stringer Bell like this. -
Da 'Fins Season Ticket Holder Staff Member Club Member
Sure a FB to compete or win out would be nice (in the 5th - 7th round) but in the 3rd round? Don't see the value in that with other needs. Unless you really think you are going to feature a FB.
-
It depends on how you're going to use him. A lot of what teams have done recently is use split-back sets like Bill Walsh did with his WCO. If you can get a guy who can catch, run and block, essentially serving as a beefed up h-back, then why not?
Stitches likes this. -
-
As to late round TE possibilities, I'd rather look at Zach Maynard and other likely late round TEs than a FB, including this guy here:
http://blogs.windsorstar.com/2013/04/23/willsons-stock-for-nfl-draft-on-the-rise/
6-5, 250, ran a 4.47 at his pro day and is a highly regarded baseball player in the Blue jays farm system. Not bad. Sounds like Les Brown physical ability with real football experience.