I am biased but he is 6'5 / 250
He completed 67.1% of his passes in a very tough SEC and threw 28 TDs and 6 INTs
He ran for 1,409 yards (breaking a 40+ year SEC record) and 20 TDs and he caught a TD for good measure.
Look at Tim Tebow's stats for 2009 as comparison
He completed 67.8% of his passes and threw 21 TDS with 5 INTs.
He ran for 910 yards and 14 TDs.
Everyone said Tebow could not play in the NFL, but he is doing OK. I am thinking Newton with Brandon Marshall there could be a Roethlisberger type? Especially with a good running game.
At worst he adds excitement and he is better than Henne, who just looks terrible.
Am I off my rocker here?
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.
Page 1 of 2
-
-
I must admit, it does frustrate me when a guy like big ben has his pocket collapse, but he's too damn big and physical to get down, and he keeps the play alive...
and compound that with a guy who can bust out for a quick 10 and get you the first down.Auburn likes this. -
i am on board with drafting newton too...i don't think many on this board will be though
-
War. Damn. Eagle.
-
finsbuck719, Rocky Raccoon and jetssuck like this.
-
You're just slandering him now. -
He would be a very very raw prospect though.
-
I wouldnt be upset if we drafted Newton. I compare him to Josh Freeman, and hes doing well I'd say :yes:
-
Tebow was below average on that test as well and he looks like a beast to bring down. Same for Vick, who scored poorly and Roethlisberger was not much better. But Tom Brady got a 33 (Benny got a 25), but Brady failed in comparison to Ryan Fitzpatrick and his 48!!! So would we rather have Brady or Fitzpatrick? You know who #2 was - ALEX SMITH @ 40!!!
That test is overrated!dolfan7171 and gunn34 like this. -
-
Wonderlic scores for the NFL's projected starting quarterbacks:
1. Ryan Fitzpatrick 48
2. Alex Smith 40
3. Eli Manning 39
4. Matt Stafford 38
5. Tony Romo 37
6. Aaron Rodgers 35
6. Matt Leinart 35
8. Tom Brady 33
9. Matt Ryan 32
10. Matt Schaub 31
11. Philip Rivers 30
12. Matt Hasselbeck 29
12. Marc Bulger 29
12. Brady Quinn 29
15. Mark Sanchez 28
15. Peyton Manning 28
15. Drew Brees 28
18. Josh Freeman 27
18. Joe Flacco 27
20. Carson Palmer 26
20. Jay Cutler 26
20. Kyle Orton 26
23. Ben Roethlisberger 25
24. Jason Campbell 23
25. Brett Favre 22
25. Tim Tebow 22
25. Chad Henne 22
28. Bruce Gradkowski 19
29. Vince Young 15
30. Donovan McNabb 14
30. David Garrard 14
Unknown: Matt Cassel, Matt Moore
Top quarterback prospects in 2010 NFL draft
Sam Bradford, Oklahoma 36
Colt McCoy, Texas 25
Jimmy Clausen, Notre Dame 23
Tebow 22
Other Wonderlic scores of note:
Brian Griese 39
Drew Bledsoe 36
Steve Young 33
John Elway 29
Chad Pennington 25
JaMarcus Russell 24
Mark Brunell 22
Trent Dilfer 22
Michael Vick 20
Daunte Culpepper 18
Dan Marino 15
Randall Cunningham 15
Jim Kelly 15
Terry Bradshaw 15
Chris Leak 8 -
I'm not sold on him and I don't think he'll be even an average NFL QB. I could be wrong, of course, but I don't see it in his play.
Jsut for fun: JaMarcus Russell stats: 67.8% comp, 28 TD's, 8 INT's.
Excitement doesn't equate to good. Look at Vick during his career (other than this year). He sucked but was "exciting". -
War Eagle! I like Newton's potential but I have serious concerns over his maturity. Face it, the kids had his share of trouble. If thate isn't an issue I think he'd be a great prospect. Big arm, seems to be accurate and difficult to bring down for sure. On top of that, the kid is an athlete as well. AND, he might be there at 15 if we can't move up.
-
-
-
I think our operational definition of "suck" differs, Marine.
His completion % was awful but his rushing numbers were outstanding. In his four healthy seasons with the Falcons he was decent.
24 TDs in 02-03
17 TDs in 04-05
21 TDs in 05-06
22 TDs in 06-07
These are combined for rushing/passing.
He ran for over 1,000 yards in 06-07
He was not great but he did not suck and he did not really have a good WR (not one).
Just saying. -
-
Funny that Roddy White was not good with Vick, but somehow became awesome/unstoppable with Matt Ryan. Vick was a terrible QB in Atlanta. His throwing numbers were just not good. He was an incredible athlete, and did amazing things rushing the ball...but that shouldn't discount how bad he was throwing the ball.
-
-
I would be happy if we draft Newton... hes one of the few QBs in this draft id take with that first round pick if available...
-
Time, like the next season with Matt Ryan time? Ryan, in his first year, threw 16 tds. Roddy White caught 7 of them. He caught 6 the year before. He had 1,000+ yard season in 2006 and 2007. I wouldn't say that he sucked. Roddy caught 6 tds from Vick in 2006. I guess what I'm saying is that Vick had a legit number one, a pretty dominant run game, and a decent tight end, and he struggled to throw the ball in Atlanta. He was not a good QB. He was a playmaker, just not by throwing the ball.
MarinePhinFan likes this. -
Vick had accuracy issues in Atlanta, this much is true. Roddy White was a rookie when Vick was there and as we have seen from many WR's, it wasn't until White's 3rd year that he became what he is today. All that being said, it's safe to say that the Eagles coaching has helped Vick out tremendously, not to mention Vick's new attitude on life and football. Remember when he was with Atlanta, he was a superstar who was all over Sports Illustrated and all over ESPN. He had the attitude that he didn't have to put in the work b/c he was so good already. Now that his attitude has changed and he has the right coaching around him (to go with the weapons the Eagles have), you have seen his accuracy improve dramatically.
The other thing to remember with Vick is that he has had always had an unbelievably strong arm to go with his speed and elusiveness. What was lacking was the accuracy and that appears to be solved.
When comparing Vick to Newton, it would be interesting to see what Vick's numbers looked like in college and how accurate he was. Newton has shown that he can be very accurate in the college game, if Vick showed something similar, you may see an adjustment and maturing period with Newton as well.
When I look at these two guys, I see a bit of a difference. I would be that Newton has the better overall QB skills then Vick while Vick coming out of college had the better overall intangibles (rediculously strong arm, speed, elusiveness). That being said, I have heard Newton has to work on his feet in the pocket and obviously the NFL is much faster then college overall. Will be an interesting debate leading up to the draft and also into the 2011 season. My opinion on Newton (and this isn't anything I would take to the bank b/c I just don't know enough about him) is that he will take a year or two to learn in the NFL to turn into a franchise QB. A little different to a Sam Bradford who you could kind of tell was NFL ready coming out of college. -
Everyone *****es about Henne but Cam Newton won't be ready to go in and start. He is a good athlete but a project.
You miss big with a player who needs proper development and you set this franchise back years.
No thanks on Cam Newton. Besides he is majoring in Social Services. Doubt he would have the brains to be a good NFL QB. :shifty:jetssuck and MarinePhinFan like this. -
Newton is the type of prospect that alot of teams could regret passing up, he has got mad size and talent but like with most college QB's their mental makeup and how it translates to the Pro level is always a question mark.
But he does seem to have everything you would want in the making of a NFL QB.Auburn likes this. -
I love Josh Freeman. It's ironic that the jests traded up for a yet to be determined, shaky work in progress but could have stayed where they were for a true game changing "franchise QB." Would love to pick up someone like him.
But the question is: would we have to hide our laptops when he's nearby? -
Vick 2000 college stats
Comp % was 54. He threw for 8 TDs and ran for 8 TDs.
Career Passing: 87 Cmp, 161 Att, 1234 Yds, 8 TD
Career Rushing: 104 Att, 617 Yds, 5.9 Avg, 8 TD
Career Scoring: 8 TD, 48 Pts
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/michael-vick-1.html -
No thanks to drafting a QB in the 1st round that you have to hope will want it bad enough to put in the work.
-
If that is struggling, sign me up.Auburn likes this. -
To be perfectly honest, I wouldn't mind Cam at all... I think he could work well with what we have on offense already. I'm not going to go crazy if we don't draft him, but I certainly wouldn't be upset if we did.
I should really change my username/theme. -
-
-
While it is true that Roddy didnt put up 1000+ his first two years with Vick, he also only caught like 30 balls hose seasons...bit he was averaging like 15 yards a catch. He didn't "suck" at any point when Vick was there.
Page 1 of 2
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.