Kind of a hard system to implement when no one is above level 2. This is harder to move on than Ninja Warrior.

I say scale it down some. Then, I will make sure to cotinue NOT participating...:up:

 

Alen's level 5 and climbing though I don't think anyone's going to come close to him and he'll be level 9 before you know it. :wink2:

 

If we combine ours...........we'd still only be half his. :up:

 

I guess so. Too bad alen can't loan me a few reps. :lol:

 

pretty cool.

im not as prolific as i used to be, though i come here just as often. i have like 13K at the other place

 

Now there's epic. More rep points than anyone including admins. :tongue2:

 

OK I'm going to have to type everything that pops into my head just to shed the rook badge! and with my typing skills its gona be a looong wait! :no:

Gish I'm guessing your really proud to get into the 100 club?! :lol:

 

*checks post count*

edit: wow not even close to anything

 

:lol: Samphin w/ the 'Ninja Warrior' reference...AWESOME.:up:


*gratuitous post included*

 

:lol::lol::lol::lol: your sig made me laugh out loud

 

Not if we get him a girlfriend.:lol:

 

Post count is overated .It the substance of the posts that counts IMO.

Since that is hard to measure I suggest you divide rep points or thanks....they are directly related...by post count to get an approximation of the quality of the posting.

I am guessing Boomer would top that list.

 

gotta see my numbers

hmm, I don't know if I am good or not, but I AM confused..

 

Thanks/Posts = My Head Hurts

 

For those who have too much time on their hands.:lol:

I am guessing there are a couple of members here in that category :yes:

 

If you take Boomer's # of thanks/total number of posts, you get something like 91%, which is pretty much an untouchable gold standard.

 

Just one more example for comparison: Chris (ckparrothead) has a "post quality rating" of 73%, using the above-suggested formula.

 

Shoulda finished math class.

 

I think the system breaks down when you look at Pagans numbers.

Are undressed women considered quality posts ? I guess so according to our horndog members.:pointlol:

 

:yes:

 

Theres more than one way to skin a cat Crunch :wink2:

 

I believe im at 43%...

 

You are correct. I'm hovering around 69%, it would appear. Heh heh.

 

69 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :shifty:

 

^^ perfect example of a non "quality" post......yet it counts AS a post.....


its science...

 

There is a beautiful world out there, believe it or not.

 

57%-I think.

 

MY god you just keep making threads that benefit Alen!

 

Actually, I have you at 36%. Sorry. :sad:

1,706 thanks receiveved/4,731 total posts

 

:sad:

Wow! I really suck!

 

Nah ... you're aight. :bighug:

 

How can a girl get a good post count, when you can't get a word in edge wise with all you guys here????? :innocent:

 

Hush, the men are talking. :wink2:

 

meh.... not a fan.

i've been on a dolphin forum somewhere since they've existed on the internetz.... yet my post count would qualify me as a "rook poster".

just because someone isn't a post-whore doesn't mean they are a rookie or newbie or whatever you call it. some of our best posters are very infrequent with their posting.

if anything, i vote to remove the post count, keep the "thanks" (if you want to talk about rep or anything). post-count should have no bearing on anything on here, honestly.

 

Combining my numbers from the other place I out do Alen!

Oh wait :cry: