Weren't you one of the guys that pounded the desk last year for Philbin and said continuity would make us stronger?

Edit:
My apologies. I was getting you mixed up with too good for dez.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Each player will take things differently.

 

Tannehill is just being a good QB and team leader and saying what the team wants him to say. Plus, he's not a defensive player, and the biggest and most obvious give-up has been on defense.

 

OF COURSE Tannehill said that. He NEVER says or does anything to throw a teammate under the bus. He's never once criticized his horrible oline in 3+ seasons, or called out his receivers.

It's proof of nothing.

 

:lol: This is just typical press conference player speak. What do you want them to do? Throw the staff under the bus? These guys know there's only so few NFL jobs and teams available. They aren't about to screw themselves that way. I mean, I know, you love Philbin and all, but even you have to think the point you're trying to make here is a bit silly given the current state of things.

 

The last time I saw someone try to climb out of a hole this desperately it was accompanied with the words, "It puts the lotion in the basket."

 

If tannehill said anything like philbin said about him last year, i would buy a tannehill jersey.

Something like "im not sure he will be the head coach for week 6, we'll see.. "

 

I think it's a good, professional stance by Tannehill. He's an all-around good guy. I just wish he could win some of these games on his own.

 

I take anything I read or hear through a news report with a grain of salt. I worked in law enforcement for over 30 years and I was present when many things occurred which made it into the news.

I saw first hand how quotes and facts were distorted to create a better news report. So any time I read about an anonymous source, I believe about 10% of what I read has some truth in it and figure the other 90% is completely fiction. Unfortunately it is impossible to figure out which 10% of the report is factual. Therefore I simply end up discounting the entire report.

 

Tannehill is probably very aware that hes going to have a new HC soon. The last thing he wants for any potential coach to hear him, the newly paid guaranteed to be here for years qb, mouthing off about his coach.

That wouldn't look good. That alone would be a reason not to come coach miami. "Well tannehill won't stick by me, **** that noise"

 

Exactly what I thought.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

luuuuucyyyyyyy, you got some splaining to dooooo

this move is all about leadership and motivation..you were wrong..the team wasn't playing as hard or intense as they could of..im interested to hear your response?

 

A big part of my critic of Tannehill is that he seriously lacks leadership skills. IMO a real leader at the QB position would have said, "I need to step up my game and leadership. I need to motivate the players around me to perform at a higher level, to be ready on our first drive, etc..."

How lacking in leadership is Tannehill? That void in leadership allowed Richie Incognito to be the team leader two years ago leading to all kinds of dysfunction and blowing up the OL that many now say is the cause of Tannehill's piss-poor play. That isn't something that would have happened under the leadership of a Brady, Manning, Rodgers, and most starting QBs.

 

Is there someone that can check on Piston Honda to make sure he's ok?

 

Maybe he's cleaning out his office... :shifty:

 

PISTON HONDA was Joe Philbin:shifty:

 

But hey, at least he can be happy that the people running the organization didn't listen to the fanbase and did it all on their own.

Those guys did it for the right reasons and not the reasons we were complaining and whining about, which were the wrong reasons because we didn't watch the tape 25 times after each game

 

Frustration can be easily mislabeled as "passion."

 

An interesting theory, but even Joe Philbin took more accountability for his failures than Piston Honda did.

 

As a fanbase, we have to...HAVE TO....start understanding that the things said in PCs or to reporters by someone from the team may not be true and that person is just playing the game the way they are supposed to.

Players and coaches do not regularly openly call each other out and always find a way to offer support. Its part of the game.

 

While that's 100% true. Would you agree there was something behind Campbell's consistent hammering home of the idea that there wasn't enough intensity and competition in practices and within the players themselves? And is it safe to assume or believe that players were just "going through the motions" under Philbin?

 

Sure. I'm not saying what they say is never the truth. As I said in my post (they may not be true).

I'm just saying harping on the comments made by Tannehill because he isn't crucifying Philbin after the game doesn't mean anything.

 

Seriously ? Let me refresh your memory, you were constantly reminding us that " after reviewing the tapes " , you were certain that the players played as hard as their minimal ability and talent would let them. WRONG ! They were NOT playing hard enough with Philbin as their leader. Thats quite obvious now, so you might want to go re-watch the tapes to see where you went wrong. We all make mistakes, just admit it and move on.

And, the reason I started the post with " seriously ? ", is I still believe you post the things you do for dramatic effect only. Attention seeking comedy , if you will.

 

Not true, you`ve stated several times well after the Jags game that these players are playing as hard as they can, they`re just not good enough and Philbins leadership,or lack thereof, has little to no bearing on their performance. REMEMBER NOW ??