What Would Ryan Tannehill's QB Rating Be... (see below)

  1. 50-59

    2 vote(s)
    11.1%

  2. 60-69

    2 vote(s)
    11.1%

  3. 70-79

    9 vote(s)
    50.0%

  4. 80-89

    1 vote(s)
    5.6%

  5. 90-99

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  6. 100+

    4 vote(s)
    22.2%
  1. Dec 11, 2012 #1

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    ...if he weren't running almost exactly the same offense he did in college?

    Right now it's 72.5.
     
  2. Dec 11, 2012 #2

    Anonymous Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    13,969
    3,367
    113
    Jul 5, 2009
    The same as it is now, IMO. It gave him an advantage knowing the playbook but had it been different I think he would have had a full grasp of it by week 1 anyway. The results would most likely be the same.
     
    Stitches likes this.
  3. Dec 11, 2012 #3

    ToddPhin Premium Member Luxury Box Club Member

    42,570
    25,126
    113
    Jul 6, 2012
    NC
    It's probably closer to 80 with starting receivers who could break some TDs and contribute more in the redzone than just 1 TD in 14 attempts.
     
    SICK and NolesNPhinsFan like this.
  4. Dec 11, 2012 #4

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    I think running a different offense would've involved more than just memorizing the playbook. There would be far less facility within it for him on gameday IMO.
     
  5. Dec 11, 2012 #5

    FinNasty Alabama don’t want this... Staff Member Club Member

    24,662
    37,847
    113
    Dec 1, 2007
    In your hypothetical... does he still have the crap he has at WR? If so, probably lower.

    If he had a new offense, but better WRs... he'd have a higher rating than he does now.


    Why don't you ever state your opinion and reasoning in the original post of these types of threads? Just post a question and a poll. Is there somewhere you are going with this question? Or a point you are trying to make?
     
  6. Dec 11, 2012 #6

    brandon27 Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    46,220
    20,243
    113
    Dec 3, 2007
    Ontairo, CANADA
    I dont understand the purpose of this either... I mean who cares what the answer to a hypothetical question would be, about Tannehills QBR in a different offense? It's completely irrelevant to anything IMO.

    I say 100+

    Because my reasoning, is just as hypothetical, and make believe as yours, or anyone elses will be in this thread, because there's no way to know.
     
  7. Dec 11, 2012 #7

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    So what? Have a little fun already. My lord.

    Is there some other thread here where you see some sort of exact science happening? Feel free to frequent those instead.
     
  8. Dec 11, 2012 #8

    Disgustipate Season Ticket Holder Club Member

    32,174
    58,083
    113
    Nov 25, 2007
    Could be a legitimate argument for higher, lower, or the same.

    Less understanding of the playbook could mean it's scaled back and safer, and more conducive to QB rating. The other two are pretty self explanatory.
     
  9. Dec 11, 2012 #9

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    Do you think they've scaled back the one he's using currently to allow for his transition into the NFL?
     
  10. Dec 11, 2012 #10

    2socks Rebuilding Since 1973

    8,141
    2,103
    113
    Nov 27, 2008
    Atlanta
    I think we should bring back dANTE cULPEPPER
     
  11. Dec 11, 2012 #11

    maynard Who, whom?

    18,425
    6,346
    113
    Dec 5, 2007
    clearwater, fl
    where is the "i'm an idiot" option?
     
  12. Dec 11, 2012 #12

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    So far it looks like that's the "70-79" choice. ;)
     
  13. Dec 11, 2012 #13

    Stringer Bell Post Hard, Post Often Club Member

    44,356
    22,480
    113
    Mar 22, 2008
    Probably the same IMO. Running a different scheme would hurt him, but at the same time it could also give some of the TDs that have gone to RBs to Tannehill.
     
  14. Dec 11, 2012 #14

    shouright Banned

    22,845
    8,861
    0
    Dec 13, 2007
    If they would've made it to the red zone for those TDs as often. ;)
     
  15. Dec 11, 2012 #15

    Guest

    He sucks. We need winners. We need Cleo Lemon.

    Oh, where have you gone, Cleonardo?

    [VIDEO=youtube;8nYGdoYOdjQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nYGdoYOdjQ[/VIDEO]
     
  16. Dec 11, 2012 #16

    Guest

    I voted 50-59.

    I did so, because, if he weren't running the same offense that he had in college, he wouldn't be starting this year.
     
(You must log in or sign up to reply here.)

Share This Page