I, like many, was very much in favor of selecting Ryan Tannehill with the #8 overall pick in 2011.
This thread is to look back to 2011 and focus on the reason(s) why myself, many others, and most importantly the Miami Dolphins thought the same.
Tannehill had many questions about his pure passing abilites. His accuracy was in question, throwing dropable passes was a knock on him, and being new to the position were knocks. But the positives were apparent. He has a strong arm, he ran a pro style offense pretty well in only a short period of time and most importantly.....HE WAS AN ATHLETE.
If Tannehill was as athletic as say Drew Bledsoe or even Tom Brady, would he even be selected in the first 3 rounds? I'd say the answer to that is an easy no.
Point being, why is he being coached to basically drop back in the pocket and be Drew Bledsoe? If he's never going to maneuver in the pocket and/or tuck the ball and run, then what was the point? Why did we draft a player and take one of his biggest assets away? I mean honestly, he's got to be amongst the bottom few QBs in rushing yards and/or rush attempts.
I'm completely baffled by this. That 2nd down and goal(after the Jimmy Wilson INT) where he had the whole right side of the field in front of him and didn't run may have cost us 4 points and the game. This is a play he would've run a year ago. So it only leads me to believe he's being coached to do this.
Whether this is Sherman, Zach Taylor, Philbin, or a combination of all 3, which I have every reason to believe it's a combo, there's clearly a failure in player development here. And it's quite scary to be honest and makes me question whether these guys are right for the job.
EDIT:
To be completely fair to Tannehill and the coaches, his accuracy has developed as has every other part of his passing game. It'd be nice if he could couple that with one of his bigger assets, his athletic ability
Page 1 of 2
-
Springveldt, Ronnie Bass, DePhinistr8 and 6 others like this.
-
-
-
Eop05 likes this.
-
i look at tannehill and i see joe philbin. he has totally taken his personality. i dont see any fire from this kid. he sounded like a robotic, emotionless philbin at the post game podium.
Colmax likes this. -
-
-
-
Im not baffled by it at all. He understands how to make reads and progressions. He ****s up once in a while but imo these are just growing pains. Most QB's have them. The accuracy has been there for the most part.
I dont want my QB running to be honest. It has its moments but if you do it regularly all it does is lead to more injuries (see Vick, RG3 etc). Last year Aaron Rodgers got sacked 1 out of every 11 dropbacks, Tannehill is at 1 of 8 this year. All running the ball means is youre more likely to get hit almost every time. If Tannehill drops back 32x hes getting 4 sacks and numerous other hits. All youre doing is getting your QB more beat up. Gimme a pocket QB all day. QB's should only be running after all other options have been exhausted and the pocket has collapsed. If the pocket is still in tact and its integrity hasnt been compromised, you dont run imo. The ball moves faster when you throw it.
Also, Im not a Mike Sherman fan but the one thing hes done right is this. -
But the question is WHY???? WHY did he not run in that situation? One of his best attributes is his ability to run and move, and a major reason why he was the #8 overrall pick! Something is keeping him in the pocket moreso this year than last year. And I believe it's being coached into him, which is very very badmaynard likes this. -
-
This is all way easier said as a fan seeing the replay tho, I'll admit. it's a split second decision. -
As I said, his passing is progressing, especially the ball placemen and accuracy. I'm very happy with that for the most part -
I ****ing hate that man.MikeHoncho likes this. -
It could be Ryan holding Ryan back for all I knowEop05 likes this. -
PhinFan1968 To 2020, and BEYOND! Club Member
Ya that was fairly disappointing to see him not tuck and run on that play...disheartening.
I'm fully of the belief the main problem here is Sherman. With the exception of that 2nd TD pass to Matthews, dull, predictable, sometimes senseless play-calls in my opinion.
If the goal for this season was to cement RT in the pocket, they've certainly achieved it. I like his progress to this point and still have trust that he'll be our guy at QB for several years...but I also think the QB coach and OC need to bounce. -
Also notice how Wallace is also bent on catching that one with his body, even as he goes out of bounds for it.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk 4maynard likes this. -
peyton manning has one rushing td this season, how about tanny?
-
PhinFan1968 To 2020, and BEYOND! Club Member
-
Eop05 likes this.
-
-
That's about all I can think of. Those are the only 3 guys that can live and survive inside the pocket solely. Maybe even Rogers if he had to.
That's kinda where my point is. I'm going to check on this, but I'm willing to bet a guy like Joe Flacco has more rushes and/or attempts than Tannehill (EDIT. Flacco 13 att. Tannehill 23. I was wrong here) -
Ryan is not the issue. I can see how he may have looked like the issue in week 4 but by now...anyone with real knowledge of the game knows he's good, and is being held back by a completely inept O-line and idiotic playcalling.
Ducken and PhinFan1968 like this. -
It's a fair criticism IMO, and while I think the coaches are partly to blame I don't think RT should get a free pass. Ultimately he's the QB, he's not in danger of being benched so he basically can go out there, make plays when the feeling hits him and the coaches couldn't do a damn thing about it. It's like the coaches telling Wake to use more spin moves, if he wants to he will, if not, what are they gonna do, sit him?
My best guess is they want him to focus down field and let the protections take care of themselves, Pouncey does most of the protection calls from what I can tell. As he gets more experience I'm sure they'll begin to put more on his plate. -
-
Just run/scramble a few times, it doesn't have to highlight reel material, just enough to make the defense take note of it. That would make a big difference IMO.Eop05 likes this. -
Him not running those few times he has a chance in the first 56 minutes of a game, can very much effect the way the opposing defense defends in those last 4 minutes.
Russel Wilson is not the passer Tannehill is, IMO. But he's been much more effective at leading his offense to score points because of how he forces defense to play.
I think those 2-4 tuck and runs or scrambles per game will really help out overall with the offenseGMJohnson likes this. -
Scramble a few times and all of a sudden the pass rushers have to be more disciplined in their rush, the LB's can't drop quite as deep as they may otherwise, coordinators may choose to play more zone or be forced to use a spy when they play man.
I think we're past the point where we can pick and choose which weapons we use and which ammo we leave in the chamber. We need to make use of EVERY advantage we have.Eop05 likes this. -
-
3 things really irked me about the coaching tonight
1. Tannehill's apparently being coached to stand tough in the pocket and do as much as possible to avoid scrambling. (at least that's how I'm interpreting it)
2. Another long week (12 damn days!!!) and we come out extremely flat as we did with Buffalo after the bye. AND we again look worse conditioned than the opposing team ON A LONG WEEK
3. Taking Rishard Matthews off the field in lieu of Mike Wallace on 2 WR sets INSIDE THE 30! Can anyone explain this one to me?
Page 1 of 2